Information on Result #1321719
Linear OA(884, 103, F8, 56) (dual of [103, 19, 57]-code), using construction X with Varšamov bound based on
- linear OA(879, 96, F8, 56) (dual of [96, 17, 57]-code), using
- 7 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(886, 103, F8, 63) (dual of [103, 17, 64]-code), using
- a “GraCyc†code from Grassl’s database [i]
- 7 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(886, 103, F8, 63) (dual of [103, 17, 64]-code), using
- linear OA(879, 98, F8, 52) (dual of [98, 19, 53]-code), using Gilbert–Varšamov bound and bm = 879 > Vbs−1(k−1) = 167690 244287 498764 134495 071216 324398 091062 241897 719782 827384 944193 852848 [i]
- linear OA(83, 5, F8, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,8) or 5-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(5,8) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(83, 8, F8, 3) (dual of [8, 5, 4]-code or 8-arc in PG(2,8) or 8-cap in PG(2,8)), using
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.