Information on Result #133297
There is no OOA(2215, 291, S2, 2, 99), because 1 step m-reduction would yield OA(2214, 291, S2, 98), but
- 9 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield OA(2223, 300, S2, 98), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 797227 776840 883681 896516 291018 079602 556004 736527 384481 376471 307374 972535 986485 205069 933364 379648 / 112622 624143 760877 566730 935625 > 2223 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 3, 99) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 2 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 4, 99) | [i] | ||
| 3 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 5, 99) | [i] | ||
| 4 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 6, 99) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 7, 99) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No OOA(2215, 291, S2, 8, 99) | [i] | ||