Information on Result #1378438
Linear OOA(989, 375, F9, 2, 33) (dual of [(375, 2), 661, 34]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OA(989, 750, F9, 33) (dual of [750, 661, 34]-code), using
- 15 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 14 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(988, 734, F9, 33) (dual of [734, 646, 34]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([727,30]), C2 = C([0,31]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,30]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([727,31]) [i] based on
- linear OA(985, 728, F9, 32) (dual of [728, 643, 33]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,30}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(985, 728, F9, 32) (dual of [728, 643, 33]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,31], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 33 [i]
- linear OA(988, 728, F9, 33) (dual of [728, 640, 34]-code), using the primitive BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,31}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 34 [i]
- linear OA(982, 728, F9, 31) (dual of [728, 646, 32]-code), using the primitive expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 728 = 93−1, defining interval I = [0,30], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 32 [i]
- linear OA(90, 3, F9, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(90, s, F9, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(90, 3, F9, 0) (dual of [3, 3, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([727,30]), C2 = C([0,31]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,30]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([727,31]) [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.