Information on Result #1379194
Linear OOA(1630, 2060, F16, 2, 10) (dual of [(2060, 2), 4090, 11]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OA(1630, 4120, F16, 10) (dual of [4120, 4090, 11]-code), using
- 16 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 15 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(1629, 4103, F16, 10) (dual of [4103, 4074, 11]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(9) ⊂ Ce(7) [i] based on
- linear OA(1628, 4096, F16, 10) (dual of [4096, 4068, 11]-code), using an extension Ce(9) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 163−1, defining interval I = [1,9], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 10 [i]
- linear OA(1622, 4096, F16, 8) (dual of [4096, 4074, 9]-code), using an extension Ce(7) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 4095 = 163−1, defining interval I = [1,7], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 8 [i]
- linear OA(161, 7, F16, 1) (dual of [7, 6, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(161, s, F16, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- construction X applied to Ce(9) ⊂ Ce(7) [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.