Information on Result #1383929
Linear OOA(3250, 178, F32, 2, 26) (dual of [(178, 2), 306, 27]-NRT-code), using OOA 2-folding based on linear OA(3250, 356, F32, 26) (dual of [356, 306, 27]-code), using
- 10 step Varšamov–Edel lengthening with (ri) = (1, 9 times 0) [i] based on linear OA(3249, 345, F32, 26) (dual of [345, 296, 27]-code), using
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([340,23]), C2 = C([0,24]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,23]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([340,24]) [i] based on
- linear OA(3247, 341, F32, 25) (dual of [341, 294, 26]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 341 | 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,23}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(3247, 341, F32, 25) (dual of [341, 294, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 341 | 322−1, defining interval I = [0,24], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 26 [i]
- linear OA(3249, 341, F32, 26) (dual of [341, 292, 27]-code), using the BCH-code C(I) with length 341 | 322−1, defining interval I = {−1,0,…,24}, and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 27 [i]
- linear OA(3245, 341, F32, 24) (dual of [341, 296, 25]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 341 | 322−1, defining interval I = [0,23], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 25 [i]
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(320, s, F32, 0) (dual of [s, s, 1]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(320, 2, F32, 0) (dual of [2, 2, 1]-code) (see above)
- construction XX applied to C1 = C([340,23]), C2 = C([0,24]), C3 = C1 + C2 = C([0,23]), and C∩ = C1 ∩ C2 = C([340,24]) [i] based on
Mode: Linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.