Information on Result #2152792

There is no OA(2148, 296, S2, 62), because 3 times code embedding in larger space would yield OA(2151, 299, S2, 62), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OOA(2149, 296, S2, 2, 63) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
2No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 2, 62) [i]Depth Reduction
3No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 3, 62) [i]
4No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 4, 62) [i]
5No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 5, 62) [i]
6No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 6, 62) [i]
7No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 7, 62) [i]
8No OOA(2148, 296, S2, 8, 62) [i]
9No (86, 148, 296)-net in base 2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array