Information on Result #2156524
There is no linear OA(269, 1366, F2, 17) (dual of [1366, 1297, 18]-code), because 1 times truncation would yield linear OA(268, 1365, F2, 16) (dual of [1365, 1297, 17]-code), but
- the Johnson bound shows that N ≤ 2 719856 398774 826021 902816 156561 250217 138501 206018 408532 430795 318951 464675 688542 064645 129403 392870 755599 690052 606562 184549 698542 094294 970507 551598 387125 208122 890537 055838 381132 624124 482660 847409 751516 844418 671837 080840 896031 691049 245327 537052 444146 622107 645880 370607 487258 679777 614901 001498 173830 988664 250960 127204 760996 047507 816541 004875 079943 009024 101015 130465 058781 710215 966350 735426 758748 < 21297 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.