Information on Result #2157133
There is no linear OA(2169, 177, F2, 87) (dual of [177, 8, 88]-code), because 1 times truncation would yield linear OA(2168, 176, F2, 86) (dual of [176, 8, 87]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(282, 89, F2, 43) (dual of [89, 7, 44]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(281, 88, F2, 42) (dual of [88, 7, 43]-code), but
- “Hel†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(281, 88, F2, 42) (dual of [88, 7, 43]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.