Information on Result #2157275
There is no linear OA(2181, 190, F2, 93) (dual of [190, 9, 94]-code), because 1 times truncation would yield linear OA(2180, 189, F2, 92) (dual of [189, 9, 93]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(288, 96, F2, 46) (dual of [96, 8, 47]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(242, 49, F2, 23) (dual of [49, 7, 24]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(241, 48, F2, 22) (dual of [48, 7, 23]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(219, 25, F2, 11) (dual of [25, 6, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(218, 24, F2, 10) (dual of [24, 6, 11]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(28, 13, F2, 5) (dual of [13, 5, 6]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(27, 12, F2, 4) (dual of [12, 5, 5]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(28, 13, F2, 5) (dual of [13, 5, 6]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(218, 24, F2, 10) (dual of [24, 6, 11]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(219, 25, F2, 11) (dual of [25, 6, 12]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(241, 48, F2, 22) (dual of [48, 7, 23]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(242, 49, F2, 23) (dual of [49, 7, 24]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.