Information on Result #2157582
There is no linear OA(2203, 213, F2, 103) (dual of [213, 10, 104]-code), because 1 times truncation would yield linear OA(2202, 212, F2, 102) (dual of [212, 10, 103]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2100, 109, F2, 51) (dual of [109, 9, 52]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(299, 108, F2, 50) (dual of [108, 9, 51]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(249, 57, F2, 25) (dual of [57, 8, 26]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(299, 108, F2, 50) (dual of [108, 9, 51]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.