Information on Result #2158459
There is no linear OA(2260, 270, F2, 131) (dual of [270, 10, 132]-code), because 1 times truncation would yield linear OA(2259, 269, F2, 130) (dual of [269, 10, 131]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(2129, 138, F2, 65) (dual of [138, 9, 66]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(2128, 137, F2, 64) (dual of [137, 9, 65]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(264, 72, F2, 32) (dual of [72, 8, 33]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(265, 73, F2, 33) (dual of [73, 8, 34]-code), but
- “BJV†bound on codes from Brouwer’s database [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(265, 73, F2, 33) (dual of [73, 8, 34]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(264, 72, F2, 32) (dual of [72, 8, 33]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(2128, 137, F2, 64) (dual of [137, 9, 65]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.