Information on Result #2172234
There is no linear OA(1692, 97, F16, 87) (dual of [97, 5, 88]-code), because 3 times truncation would yield linear OA(1689, 94, F16, 84) (dual of [94, 5, 85]-code), but
- construction Y1 [i] would yield
- OA(1688, 90, S16, 84), but
- 4 times truncation [i] would yield OA(1684, 86, S16, 80), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound shows that M ≥ 4 479489 484355 608421 114884 561136 888556 243290 994469 299069 799978 201927 583742 360321 890761 754986 543214 231552 / 27 > 1684 [i]
- 4 times truncation [i] would yield OA(1684, 86, S16, 80), but
- OA(165, 94, S16, 4), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 2179 760128 / 2071 > 165 [i]
- OA(1688, 90, S16, 84), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.