Information on Result #2178983
Linear OA(2134, 163, F2, 52) (dual of [163, 29, 53]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(2134, 163, F2, 53) (dual of [163, 29, 54]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(54) ⊂ Ce(42) [i] based on
- linear OA(2113, 128, F2, 55) (dual of [128, 15, 56]-code), using an extension Ce(54) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 127 = 27−1, defining interval I = [1,54], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 55 [i]
- linear OA(299, 128, F2, 43) (dual of [128, 29, 44]-code), using an extension Ce(42) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 127 = 27−1, defining interval I = [1,42], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 43 [i]
- linear OA(221, 35, F2, 9) (dual of [35, 14, 10]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(221, 42, F2, 9) (dual of [42, 21, 10]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(42,2) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(221, 42, F2, 9) (dual of [42, 21, 10]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.