Information on Result #2180113
Linear OA(2152, 184, F2, 56) (dual of [184, 32, 57]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(2152, 184, F2, 59) (dual of [184, 32, 60]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1615, 23, F16, 14) (dual of [23, 8, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1615, 24, F16, 14) (dual of [24, 9, 15]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,9P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1615, 24, F16, 14) (dual of [24, 9, 15]-code), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(1615, 23, F16, 14) (dual of [23, 8, 15]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.