Information on Result #2186799
Linear OA(2232, 256, F2, 96) (dual of [256, 24, 97]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(2232, 256, F2, 99) (dual of [256, 24, 100]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1626, 32, F16, 24) (dual of [32, 6, 25]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1626, 33, F16, 24) (dual of [33, 7, 25]-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric code AGe(F,8P) [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(1626, 33, F16, 24) (dual of [33, 7, 25]-code), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(1626, 32, F16, 24) (dual of [32, 6, 25]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.