Information on Result #2191075
Linear OA(392, 108, F3, 49) (dual of [108, 16, 50]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(392, 108, F3, 50) (dual of [108, 16, 51]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(919, 27, F9, 16) (dual of [27, 8, 17]-code), using
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- the Hermitian function field over F9 [i]
- algebraic-geometric code AG(F,10P) [i] based on function field F/F9 with g(F) = 3 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- linear OA(32, 4, F3, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,3)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,3) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,3) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,3) [i]
- the Tetracode [i]
- linear OA(919, 27, F9, 16) (dual of [27, 8, 17]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.