Information on Result #2191250
Linear OA(398, 105, F3, 61) (dual of [105, 7, 62]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(398, 105, F3, 62) (dual of [105, 7, 63]-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OA(317, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 7, 12]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(317, 25, F3, 11) (dual of [25, 8, 12]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(320, 28, F3, 14) (dual of [28, 8, 15]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(317, 25, F3, 11) (dual of [25, 8, 12]-code), using
- linear OA(374, 81, F3, 50) (dual of [81, 7, 51]-code), using
- an extension Ce(49) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 80 = 34−1, defining interval I = [1,49], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 50 [i]
- linear OA(317, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 7, 12]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.