Information on Result #2191876
Linear OA(3117, 133, F3, 64) (dual of [133, 16, 65]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3117, 133, F3, 67) (dual of [133, 16, 68]-code), using
- construction X applied to Ce(66) ⊂ Ce(60) [i] based on
- linear OA(3111, 122, F3, 67) (dual of [122, 11, 68]-code), using an extension Ce(66) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 121 | 35−1, defining interval I = [1,66], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 67 [i]
- linear OA(3106, 122, F3, 61) (dual of [122, 16, 62]-code), using an extension Ce(60) of the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 121 | 35−1, defining interval I = [1,60], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 61 [i]
- linear OA(36, 11, F3, 5) (dual of [11, 5, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended Golay code Ge(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(36, 12, F3, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.