Information on Result #2193382
Linear OA(3152, 176, F3, 72) (dual of [176, 24, 73]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3152, 176, F3, 74) (dual of [176, 24, 75]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2714, 22, F27, 14) (dual of [22, 8, 15]-code or 22-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(13,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2714, 27, F27, 14) (dual of [27, 13, 15]-code or 27-arc in PG(13,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2714, 22, F27, 14) (dual of [22, 8, 15]-code or 22-arc in PG(13,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.