Information on Result #2194511
Linear OA(3174, 210, F3, 74) (dual of [210, 36, 75]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3174, 210, F3, 77) (dual of [210, 36, 78]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8112, 21, F81, 12) (dual of [21, 9, 13]-code or 21-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8112, 81, F81, 12) (dual of [81, 69, 13]-code or 81-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(69,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8112, 81, F81, 12) (dual of [81, 69, 13]-code or 81-arc in PG(11,81)), using
- linear OA(36, 10, F3, 5) (dual of [10, 4, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(8112, 21, F81, 12) (dual of [21, 9, 13]-code or 21-arc in PG(11,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.