Information on Result #2194611
Linear OA(3176, 200, F3, 87) (dual of [200, 24, 88]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3176, 200, F3, 89) (dual of [200, 24, 90]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2717, 25, F27, 17) (dual of [25, 8, 18]-code or 25-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2717, 27, F27, 17) (dual of [27, 10, 18]-code or 27-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(10,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2717, 27, F27, 17) (dual of [27, 10, 18]-code or 27-arc in PG(16,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2717, 25, F27, 17) (dual of [25, 8, 18]-code or 25-arc in PG(16,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.