Information on Result #2194778
Linear OA(3179, 200, F3, 92) (dual of [200, 21, 93]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3179, 200, F3, 94) (dual of [200, 21, 95]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2718, 25, F27, 18) (dual of [25, 7, 19]-code or 25-arc in PG(17,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2718, 27, F27, 18) (dual of [27, 9, 19]-code or 27-arc in PG(17,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(9,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2718, 27, F27, 18) (dual of [27, 9, 19]-code or 27-arc in PG(17,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2718, 25, F27, 18) (dual of [25, 7, 19]-code or 25-arc in PG(17,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.