Information on Result #2195304
Linear OA(3188, 224, F3, 82) (dual of [224, 36, 83]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3188, 224, F3, 84) (dual of [224, 36, 85]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2716, 28, F27, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(12,27) [i]
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2716, 28, F27, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.