Information on Result #2197152
Linear OA(3217, 261, F3, 93) (dual of [261, 44, 94]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(3217, 261, F3, 94) (dual of [261, 44, 95]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8118, 29, F81, 18) (dual of [29, 11, 19]-code or 29-arc in PG(17,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8118, 81, F81, 18) (dual of [81, 63, 19]-code or 81-arc in PG(17,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(63,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8118, 81, F81, 18) (dual of [81, 63, 19]-code or 81-arc in PG(17,81)), using
- linear OA(35, 9, F3, 4) (dual of [9, 4, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(8118, 29, F81, 18) (dual of [29, 11, 19]-code or 29-arc in PG(17,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.