Information on Result #2200278
Linear OA(466, 74, F4, 44) (dual of [74, 8, 45]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(466, 74, F4, 47) (dual of [74, 8, 48]-code), using
- construction X applied to C([0,140]) ⊂ C([1,125]) [i] based on
- linear OA(460, 63, F4, 47) (dual of [63, 3, 48]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4186, 189, F4, 143) (dual of [189, 3, 144]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [0,140], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−7,−2,3,…,−53}|+1 = 144 (BCH-bound) [i]
- linear OA(455, 63, F4, 41) (dual of [63, 8, 42]-code), using contraction [i] based on linear OA(4181, 189, F4, 125) (dual of [189, 8, 126]-code), using the narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 189 | 49−1, defining interval I = [1,125], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 126 [i]
- linear OA(46, 11, F4, 5) (dual of [11, 5, 6]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(46, 12, F4, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
- extended quadratic residue code Qe(12,4) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(46, 12, F4, 5) (dual of [12, 6, 6]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.