Information on Result #2203030
Linear OA(4159, 180, F4, 94) (dual of [180, 21, 95]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(4159, 180, F4, 95) (dual of [180, 21, 96]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6423, 30, F64, 23) (dual of [30, 7, 24]-code or 30-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(41,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6423, 64, F64, 23) (dual of [64, 41, 24]-code or 64-arc in PG(22,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6423, 30, F64, 23) (dual of [30, 7, 24]-code or 30-arc in PG(22,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OA(4158, 179, F4, 93) (dual of [179, 21, 94]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | Linear OA(4157, 178, F4, 92) (dual of [178, 21, 93]-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(4159, 90, F4, 2, 94) (dual of [(90, 2), 21, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
4 | Linear OOA(4159, 60, F4, 3, 94) (dual of [(60, 3), 21, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] |