Information on Result #2203852
Linear OA(4177, 210, F4, 98) (dual of [210, 33, 99]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(4177, 210, F4, 99) (dual of [210, 33, 100]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6424, 35, F64, 24) (dual of [35, 11, 25]-code or 35-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6424, 35, F64, 24) (dual of [35, 11, 25]-code or 35-arc in PG(23,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(4176, 209, F4, 97) (dual of [209, 33, 98]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OA(4175, 208, F4, 96) (dual of [208, 33, 97]-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(4177, 105, F4, 2, 98) (dual of [(105, 2), 33, 99]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
| 4 | Linear OOA(4177, 70, F4, 3, 98) (dual of [(70, 3), 33, 99]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||