Information on Result #2209786
Linear OA(592, 96, F5, 73) (dual of [96, 4, 74]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(592, 96, F5, 74) (dual of [96, 4, 75]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2514, 16, F25, 14) (dual of [16, 2, 15]-code or 16-arc in PG(13,25)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2514, 25, F25, 14) (dual of [25, 11, 15]-code or 25-arc in PG(13,25)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,25) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2514, 25, F25, 14) (dual of [25, 11, 15]-code or 25-arc in PG(13,25)), using
- linear OA(54, 6, F5, 4) (dual of [6, 2, 5]-code or 6-arc in PG(3,5)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,5) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,5) [i]
- linear OA(2514, 16, F25, 14) (dual of [16, 2, 15]-code or 16-arc in PG(13,25)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(592, 32, F5, 3, 73) (dual of [(32, 3), 4, 74]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |