Information on Result #2212628
Linear OA(865, 74, F8, 50) (dual of [74, 9, 51]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(865, 74, F8, 51) (dual of [74, 9, 52]-code), using
- construction XX applied to Ce(53) ⊂ Ce(45) ⊂ Ce(44) [i] based on
- linear OA(860, 64, F8, 54) (dual of [64, 4, 55]-code), using an extension Ce(53) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,53], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 54 [i]
- linear OA(856, 64, F8, 46) (dual of [64, 8, 47]-code), using an extension Ce(45) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,45], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 46 [i]
- linear OA(855, 64, F8, 45) (dual of [64, 9, 46]-code), using an extension Ce(44) of the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 63 = 82−1, defining interval I = [1,44], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 45 [i]
- linear OA(84, 9, F8, 4) (dual of [9, 5, 5]-code or 9-arc in PG(3,8)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(5,8) [i]
- linear OA(80, 1, F8, 0) (dual of [1, 1, 1]-code), using
- dual of repetition code with length 1 [i]
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.