Information on Result #2215303

Linear OA(973, 82, F9, 60) (dual of [82, 9, 61]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(973, 82, F9, 61) (dual of [82, 9, 62]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(970, 79, F9, 57) (dual of [79, 9, 58]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OA(969, 78, F9, 56) (dual of [78, 9, 57]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(968, 77, F9, 55) (dual of [77, 9, 56]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(967, 76, F9, 54) (dual of [76, 9, 55]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(966, 75, F9, 53) (dual of [75, 9, 54]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(965, 74, F9, 52) (dual of [74, 9, 53]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(964, 73, F9, 51) (dual of [73, 9, 52]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(963, 72, F9, 50) (dual of [72, 9, 51]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(962, 71, F9, 49) (dual of [71, 9, 50]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(961, 70, F9, 48) (dual of [70, 9, 49]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(960, 69, F9, 47) (dual of [69, 9, 48]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(959, 68, F9, 46) (dual of [68, 9, 47]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(958, 67, F9, 45) (dual of [67, 9, 46]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(957, 66, F9, 44) (dual of [66, 9, 45]-code) [i]
15Linear OOA(973, 41, F9, 2, 60) (dual of [(41, 2), 9, 61]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding