Information on Result #2215368

Linear OA(978, 82, F9, 70) (dual of [82, 4, 71]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(978, 82, F9, 71) (dual of [82, 4, 72]-code), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only		Method
1Linear OA(977, 81, F9, 69) (dual of [81, 4, 70]-code) [i]Truncation
2Linear OA(975, 79, F9, 67) (dual of [79, 4, 68]-code) [i]
3Linear OA(974, 78, F9, 66) (dual of [78, 4, 67]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(973, 77, F9, 65) (dual of [77, 4, 66]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(972, 76, F9, 64) (dual of [76, 4, 65]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(971, 75, F9, 63) (dual of [75, 4, 64]-code) [i]
7Linear OA(970, 74, F9, 62) (dual of [74, 4, 63]-code) [i]
8Linear OA(969, 73, F9, 61) (dual of [73, 4, 62]-code) [i]
9Linear OA(968, 72, F9, 60) (dual of [72, 4, 61]-code) [i]
10Linear OA(967, 71, F9, 59) (dual of [71, 4, 60]-code) [i]
11Linear OA(966, 70, F9, 58) (dual of [70, 4, 59]-code) [i]
12Linear OA(965, 69, F9, 57) (dual of [69, 4, 58]-code) [i]
13Linear OA(964, 68, F9, 56) (dual of [68, 4, 57]-code) [i]
14Linear OA(963, 67, F9, 55) (dual of [67, 4, 56]-code) [i]
15Linear OA(962, 66, F9, 54) (dual of [66, 4, 55]-code) [i]
16Linear OA(961, 65, F9, 53) (dual of [65, 4, 54]-code) [i]
17Linear OA(960, 64, F9, 52) (dual of [64, 4, 53]-code) [i]
18Linear OA(959, 63, F9, 51) (dual of [63, 4, 52]-code) [i]
19Linear OA(958, 62, F9, 50) (dual of [62, 4, 51]-code) [i]
20Linear OA(957, 61, F9, 49) (dual of [61, 4, 50]-code) [i]
21Linear OOA(978, 41, F9, 2, 70) (dual of [(41, 2), 4, 71]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding