Information on Result #2216703
Linear OA(9150, 172, F9, 96) (dual of [172, 22, 97]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(9150, 172, F9, 98) (dual of [172, 22, 99]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8132, 43, F81, 32) (dual of [43, 11, 33]-code or 43-arc in PG(31,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8132, 81, F81, 32) (dual of [81, 49, 33]-code or 81-arc in PG(31,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(49,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8132, 81, F81, 32) (dual of [81, 49, 33]-code or 81-arc in PG(31,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- linear OA(8132, 43, F81, 32) (dual of [43, 11, 33]-code or 43-arc in PG(31,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.