Information on Result #2216704
Linear OA(9150, 176, F9, 94) (dual of [176, 26, 95]-code), using strength reduction based on linear OA(9150, 176, F9, 95) (dual of [176, 26, 96]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(8131, 44, F81, 31) (dual of [44, 13, 32]-code or 44-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(50,81) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(8131, 81, F81, 31) (dual of [81, 50, 32]-code or 81-arc in PG(30,81)), using
- linear OA(92, 4, F9, 2) (dual of [4, 2, 3]-code or 4-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,9) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(92, 9, F9, 2) (dual of [9, 7, 3]-code or 9-arc in PG(1,9)), using
- linear OA(8131, 44, F81, 31) (dual of [44, 13, 32]-code or 44-arc in PG(30,81)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OA(9149, 175, F9, 93) (dual of [175, 26, 94]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(9150, 88, F9, 2, 94) (dual of [(88, 2), 26, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |