Information on Result #2220270
Linear OA(282, 94, F2, 37) (dual of [94, 12, 38]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(284, 96, F2, 39) (dual of [96, 12, 40]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(169, 12, F16, 9) (dual of [12, 3, 10]-code or 12-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- linear OA(24, 8, F2, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- linear OA(169, 12, F16, 9) (dual of [12, 3, 10]-code or 12-arc in PG(8,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.