Information on Result #2222653
Linear OA(2164, 173, F2, 80) (dual of [173, 9, 81]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(2166, 175, F2, 82) (dual of [175, 9, 83]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2166, 175, F2, 83) (dual of [175, 9, 84]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(822, 25, F8, 20) (dual of [25, 3, 21]-code), using
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,8) [i]
- 3 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(825, 28, F8, 23) (dual of [28, 3, 24]-code), using
- linear OA(24, 7, F2, 3) (dual of [7, 3, 4]-code or 7-cap in PG(3,2)), using
- Simplex code S(3,2) [i]
- linear OA(822, 25, F8, 20) (dual of [25, 3, 21]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.