Information on Result #2223184
Linear OA(2218, 220, F2, 127) (dual of [220, 2, 128]-code), using 41 times truncation based on linear OA(2259, 261, F2, 168) (dual of [261, 2, 169]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2259, 261, F2, 173) (dual of [261, 2, 174]-code), using
- repeating each code word 87 times [i] based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- repeating each code word 87 times [i] based on linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.