MinT - Information on Result #2225757

Information on Result #2225757

Linear OA(2¹⁹⁹, 255, F₂, 65) (dual of [255, 56, 66]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(2²⁰⁰, 256, F₂, 66) (dual of [256, 56, 67]-code), using

strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(2²⁰⁰, 256, F₂, 67) (dual of [256, 56, 68]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
  1. linear OA(16¹⁸, 32, F₁₆, 16) (dual of [32, 14, 17]-code), using
    - discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(16¹⁸, 33, F₁₆, 16) (dual of [33, 15, 17]-code), using
      - extended algebraic-geometric code AG_e(F,16P) [i] based on function field F/F₁₆ with g(F) = 2 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
        a function field by SÃ©mirat [i]
  2. linear OA(2⁴, 8, F₂, 3) (dual of [8, 4, 4]-code or 8-cap in PG(3,2)), using
    - Reedâ€“Muller code RM(1,3) [i]
    - caps in base bÂ =Â 2 [i]

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	Linear OOA(2¹⁹⁹, 85, F₂, 3, 65) (dual of [(85, 3), 56, 66]-NRT-code)	[i]		OOA Folding