Information on Result #2230298
Linear OA(3128, 149, F3, 61) (dual of [149, 21, 62]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(3132, 153, F3, 65) (dual of [153, 21, 66]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2710, 17, F27, 10) (dual of [17, 7, 11]-code or 17-arc in PG(9,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2710, 27, F27, 10) (dual of [27, 17, 11]-code or 27-arc in PG(9,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(17,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2710, 27, F27, 10) (dual of [27, 17, 11]-code or 27-arc in PG(9,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2710, 17, F27, 10) (dual of [17, 7, 11]-code or 17-arc in PG(9,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.