Information on Result #2230553
Linear OA(3135, 156, F3, 65) (dual of [156, 21, 66]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(3141, 162, F3, 71) (dual of [162, 21, 72]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2711, 18, F27, 11) (dual of [18, 7, 12]-code or 18-arc in PG(10,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2711, 27, F27, 11) (dual of [27, 16, 12]-code or 27-arc in PG(10,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(16,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2711, 27, F27, 11) (dual of [27, 16, 12]-code or 27-arc in PG(10,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2711, 18, F27, 11) (dual of [18, 7, 12]-code or 18-arc in PG(10,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.