Information on Result #2231662
Linear OA(3211, 223, F3, 127) (dual of [223, 12, 128]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(3213, 225, F3, 129) (dual of [225, 12, 130]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(3213, 225, F3, 131) (dual of [225, 12, 132]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2721, 25, F27, 21) (dual of [25, 4, 22]-code or 25-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2721, 27, F27, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(6,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2721, 27, F27, 21) (dual of [27, 6, 22]-code or 27-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- linear OA(36, 9, F3, 5) (dual of [9, 3, 6]-code), using
- linear OA(2721, 25, F27, 21) (dual of [25, 4, 22]-code or 25-arc in PG(20,27)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.