Information on Result #2231688
Linear OA(3167, 191, F3, 83) (dual of [191, 24, 84]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(3168, 192, F3, 84) (dual of [192, 24, 85]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(2716, 24, F27, 16) (dual of [24, 8, 17]-code or 24-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(11,27) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(2716, 27, F27, 16) (dual of [27, 11, 17]-code or 27-arc in PG(15,27)), using
- linear OA(35, 8, F3, 4) (dual of [8, 3, 5]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- Golay code G(3) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(35, 11, F3, 4) (dual of [11, 6, 5]-code), using
- linear OA(2716, 24, F27, 16) (dual of [24, 8, 17]-code or 24-arc in PG(15,27)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.