Information on Result #2235384
Linear OA(449, 53, F4, 37) (dual of [53, 4, 38]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(451, 55, F4, 39) (dual of [55, 4, 40]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(169, 11, F16, 9) (dual of [11, 2, 10]-code or 11-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(7,16) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(169, 16, F16, 9) (dual of [16, 7, 10]-code or 16-arc in PG(8,16)), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(169, 11, F16, 9) (dual of [11, 2, 10]-code or 11-arc in PG(8,16)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2204, 106, F2, 2, 113) (dual of [(106, 2), 8, 114]-NRT-code) | [i] | Concatenation of Two NRT-Codes | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(449, 26, F4, 2, 37) (dual of [(26, 2), 3, 38]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |