Information on Result #2238242
Linear OA(4203, 209, F4, 149) (dual of [209, 6, 150]-code), using 6 times truncation based on linear OA(4209, 215, F4, 155) (dual of [215, 6, 156]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1640, 43, F16, 38) (dual of [43, 3, 39]-code), using
- 9 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,16) [i]
- 9 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1640, 43, F16, 38) (dual of [43, 3, 39]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.