Information on Result #2238422
Linear OA(4103, 139, F4, 48) (dual of [139, 36, 49]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4104, 140, F4, 49) (dual of [140, 36, 50]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4104, 140, F4, 50) (dual of [140, 36, 51]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6416, 28, F64, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(48,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6416, 64, F64, 16) (dual of [64, 48, 17]-code or 64-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6416, 28, F64, 16) (dual of [28, 12, 17]-code or 28-arc in PG(15,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.