Information on Result #2238690
Linear OA(4220, 226, F4, 162) (dual of [226, 6, 163]-code), using 9 times truncation based on linear OA(4229, 235, F4, 171) (dual of [235, 6, 172]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(1644, 47, F16, 42) (dual of [47, 3, 43]-code), using
- 5 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- Denniston code D(2,16) [i]
- 5 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(1649, 52, F16, 47) (dual of [52, 3, 48]-code), using
- linear OA(43, 5, F4, 3) (dual of [5, 2, 4]-code or 5-arc in PG(2,4) or 5-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(2,4) [i]
- Simplex code S(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(1644, 47, F16, 42) (dual of [47, 3, 43]-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.