Information on Result #2238863
Linear OA(4128, 155, F4, 69) (dual of [155, 27, 70]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4129, 156, F4, 70) (dual of [156, 27, 71]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4129, 156, F4, 71) (dual of [156, 27, 72]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6417, 26, F64, 17) (dual of [26, 9, 18]-code or 26-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6417, 64, F64, 17) (dual of [64, 47, 18]-code or 64-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(47,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6417, 64, F64, 17) (dual of [64, 47, 18]-code or 64-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6417, 26, F64, 17) (dual of [26, 9, 18]-code or 26-arc in PG(16,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.