Information on Result #2238871
Linear OA(4116, 149, F4, 57) (dual of [149, 33, 58]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4117, 150, F4, 58) (dual of [150, 33, 59]-code), using
- strength reduction [i] based on linear OA(4117, 150, F4, 59) (dual of [150, 33, 60]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6419, 30, F64, 19) (dual of [30, 11, 20]-code or 30-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6419, 64, F64, 19) (dual of [64, 45, 20]-code or 64-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(45,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6419, 64, F64, 19) (dual of [64, 45, 20]-code or 64-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- linear OA(42, 5, F4, 2) (dual of [5, 3, 3]-code or 5-arc in PG(1,4)), using
- extended Reed–Solomon code RSe(3,4) [i]
- Hamming code H(2,4) [i]
- linear OA(6419, 30, F64, 19) (dual of [30, 11, 20]-code or 30-arc in PG(18,64)), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.