Information on Result #2239309
Linear OA(4111, 159, F4, 48) (dual of [159, 48, 49]-code), using 1 times truncation based on linear OA(4112, 160, F4, 49) (dual of [160, 48, 50]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6424, 40, F64, 24) (dual of [40, 16, 25]-code or 40-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(40,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6424, 64, F64, 24) (dual of [64, 40, 25]-code or 64-arc in PG(23,64)), using
- linear OA(41, 4, F4, 1) (dual of [4, 3, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(41, s, F4, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
- linear OA(6424, 40, F64, 24) (dual of [40, 16, 25]-code or 40-arc in PG(23,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.