Information on Result #2239597
Linear OA(4151, 178, F4, 85) (dual of [178, 27, 86]-code), using 2 times truncation based on linear OA(4153, 180, F4, 87) (dual of [180, 27, 88]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6421, 30, F64, 21) (dual of [30, 9, 22]-code or 30-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6421, 64, F64, 21) (dual of [64, 43, 22]-code or 64-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(43,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6421, 64, F64, 21) (dual of [64, 43, 22]-code or 64-arc in PG(20,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6421, 30, F64, 21) (dual of [30, 9, 22]-code or 30-arc in PG(20,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(4151, 89, F4, 2, 85) (dual of [(89, 2), 27, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] | OOA Folding | |
2 | Linear OOA(4151, 59, F4, 3, 85) (dual of [(59, 3), 26, 86]-NRT-code) | [i] |