Information on Result #2240586
Linear OA(4191, 212, F4, 115) (dual of [212, 21, 116]-code), using 4 times truncation based on linear OA(4195, 216, F4, 119) (dual of [216, 21, 120]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- linear OA(6429, 36, F64, 29) (dual of [36, 7, 30]-code or 36-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6429, 64, F64, 29) (dual of [64, 35, 30]-code or 64-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- Reed–Solomon code RS(35,64) [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(6429, 64, F64, 29) (dual of [64, 35, 30]-code or 64-arc in PG(28,64)), using
- linear OA(43, 6, F4, 3) (dual of [6, 3, 4]-code or 6-arc in PG(2,4) or 6-cap in PG(2,4)), using
- linear OA(6429, 36, F64, 29) (dual of [36, 7, 30]-code or 36-arc in PG(28,64)), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.